However, most tribal nations also disliked exogamous marriage – marriage to completely unrelated people. Īpart from the case of a man marrying his daughter, the list in Leviticus 18 roughly produces the same rules as were followed in early (pre-Islamic) Arabic culture. As with the case of a man's own daughter, the shortness of the list in Leviticus 20, and especially of that in Deuteronomy, are explained by classical Jewish scholarship as being due to the obviousness of the missing prohibitions. A man's daughter is obviously also the daughter of a woman with whom he had sexual relations.) The Talmud argues that this absence is because the prohibition was obvious, especially given the proscription against a relationship with a granddaughter. It also explicitly prohibits having sex with a woman and her daughter. If it is speaking to everyone, then a woman is not allowed to have sex with her father. (This assumes that the Torah is only speaking to men. One of the most notable features of each list is that sexual relations between a man and his own daughter are not explicitly forbidden, although the first relation mentioned after the Levitical prohibition of sex with 'near kin' is that of 'thy father'. Spouse's grandchild (including grandchild) Sibling-in-law (if the spouse was still alive) Grandparent's spouse (including other grandparent)

Incest shareman